Decentralisation and Indian villages


When one  thinks village the person  sees a  stereotype of the  films.  From the  classical jamindar to “desh-ki-dharti” and many variations in between. It is only recent media exposure and real-time visits that can portray the harsh truth. According to Census of India, any human settlement will be called village if for minimum 75% of households are engaged in agriculture, irrespective of their population, the number of hhs and area. They tend to be permanent settlements. Move toward modernisation and lack of opportunity lead to migration.

According to the 2011 census in India, 68.84% of Indians (around 833.1 million people) live in 640,867 different villages. The size of these villages varies considerably. 236,004 Indian villages have a population of fewer than 500, while 3,976 villages have a population of 10,000+. Most of the villages have their own temple, mosque, or church, depending on the local religious following. I  have presented  my case  on  Decentralisation based  on the  fundamental dynamics of village functioning.  I  have observed first-hand a plethora of  Indian villages  from the ideal to drought-hit which will be discussed herein.Let us consider the aspects systematically:

 

#1)FINANCES: The farmer  needs certain  basic amenities  to survive these are constant water supply  for at  least  6-8 months,  single phase  electricity for  at least  12-14  hours/day good quality  of grain  and farm equipment which  is subject  to weather  and investable  income. Additionally at least  2  milking animals is  essential. The current  government emphasis  on feederseparation  is an excellent move to ensure  electricity  supply  in  rural  area.  It  mandate  is  to  provide  24  hours  supply  for hhs  and  8  hours  supply  for  fields  for  irrigation.  Mr.Piyush  Goyal  has  set  up  a  live  site  which shows the current status of electrification of rural areas. In  India  48%  of  household  have  less  than  0.5  Hectare  of  land,  that  to  not  as  single  plot.  So these  farmer  can\’t  survive  depending  only  agriculture.  There  is  need  to  generate an alternate source  of  income  for  them.  While  considering  water  supply  for  irrigation  there  was a huge emphasis on irrigation projects, majorly on canal irrigation in Indo-gangatic  plane. That is big failure  and  loss  making  by  virtue  of  it  design.  Currently  the  peninsular  region  which  cover majority  of  cultivable  land  is  rain  fed.  Water  market  developing  slowly  as  big  farmer  are investing  on  individual  tube  well  and  providing  irrigation  to  nearby  fields.  So  need  for recharging these underground water source is emerging major challenge. Typical expenses incude family education, electricity bills, water bills and loans among others.

According to Centre for the Study of Developing Societies (CSDS), Delhi. The farmers take loan majorly for seeds, fertilisers and pesticide followed by farm equipment.An Indian farmer typically has an average loan of Rs.47,000/-according to Finance Minister Jayant Sinha. Nearly 50% of all Indian famers are indebted as of 2015. Organic/minimum external input based farming can be helpful in reducing these investments. Hence the reduce the need for loan.

Government provides number of schemes to its Gram that range from agricultural assistance to educational cess through the SarvaShikshaAbhiyaan. These schemes are provided by Central as well as respective State governments to their Panchayats. Statistics provided paint a shabby picture: The faltering procedure of fund transfer, lack of trust on village authorities and irresponsible allocation has led to degradation and drying up of resources. Community based worker like Accredited social health activists (ASHAs) by NRHM, KisanMitrai Society for Elimination of Rural Poverty(SERP)and Bank Mitra with micro-ATM under PMJDYshowed better results in last few years similar type of framework can be used in other schemes too. Similarly DBT linked with Aadhar number is much better over subsidies.

#2)DEVELOPMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURE: “The soul  of  India lives in its villages”  declared  M.K.Gandhi.  It  was  his  earnest  vision  to make  villages self-sustained  units  contributing  to  the  mechanism  that  is  India.  This  requires on  this  day  assitance  from  external  supporting  Institutions.  Developement  can  be  thought  of as Social and Economic. a)Social Developement: We  talk  of  progress  but  to  this  day  the  dowry, casteism, and  malpractices  are  pertinent. Villagers trust the local  sage and fall for superstitions and beliefs. Religion can play a big role in  combating  these  social  evils.  The  our  value  system  if  practiced  in  real  sense  are  capable  to do so. There  is  a  lack  of  sense  of  responsibility  within  citizens,  elected  representatives  and government  officials  towards  building  their  Gram.  There  is  a  lack  of  awareness  and knowledge-sharing.  There  is  a  lack  of  brotherhood  and  communal  bonding.  These  conditions stem from insecurity and greed. The sense of responsibility will come when people start gives priority to nation over their personal benefits. For this we need nationalism movement. b)Economic Developement: It is tough to recieve a loan and even tougher for the villager to pay it. Money lending and uncooperative financial practices are still abundant in the country. Interest rates are high in such cases but the villager is forced to take up the loan. Bank loans are institutional and unflexible on conditions such as rainfall, produce etc. It would be wrong to say that government is’nt trying. The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Emplement Garuntee Act (MGNREGA), is a phenomenal success. It has a lot of potential to develop rural areas. As it focuses on building assets in rural areas along with providing the employment. The reasons for failure lies in execution of schemes due to lack of interest by bureaucracy. Community  offers  no  or  little  help  in  such  matters.  Government  has  been  forced  to  waiver loans in the past due to huge drought and the miserable plight of the farmers. Through  personal  travels  to  villages  in  the  Nagpur-Vidharbabelt, my  hometown at Beed, Maharashtra, and  Good Governance Yatra I got the opportunity to experience first hand what village really is.
Mr.PopatraoPawar, Mr.Anna  Hazare have created villages that are role models of self-sustainability, awareness, and communal living).At the same time M.P.’s and M.L.A.’s under the Saansad Gram AdarshYojna(SAGY) are trying to devlope local villages into models to follow.

Avantika Foundation which is co-founded by Mr.T.Raghunandan, a 2009 retired I.A.S. officer is spreading awareness on decentralization and its necessity in villages in Kolar and Chikkaballapur districts as well as to the State and Central Government. Such example set the model to replicate. But proper customization is pre-requisite for success. There  is  a  war  going  on  which  aims  to  shift  mentalities  and  fulfil  visions.Evidentally  the process  of  decentralisation  has  evolved  and  become  a  complicated  dance  of  hand-holding between the Gram, Government and N.G.O. A  pertinent  question  to  ask  Mr.Pawar would  be: Why  hasn’t  the  neighbouring  village  also developed into a self-sustained one? How long will dependence remain is an unanswered question.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *